Tornado Cash Civil Decision Limits the Reach of the Treasury Department’s Actions while Skirting a Full First Amendment Analysis

Favorite A District Court recently considered a civil claim that the Treasury Department overstepped when it listed Tornado Cash on the U.S. sanctions list. This claim took some steps, if not enough, to address EFF’s concerns about coders rights.   In the case, Van Loon v Department of the Treasury, EFF argued in an amicus…

Federal Judge Upholds Arizonans’ Right to Record the Police

Favorite The Arizona legislature last year passed a law (H.B. 2319 codified at A.R.S. § 13-3732) banning the video recording of police activity within eight feet of officers, making doing so a class 3 misdemeanor (which would allow for up to 30 days in jail). The law included some exceptions, such as for “a person…

EFF to 9th Circuit: App Stores Shouldn’t Be Liable for Processing Payments for User Content

Favorite EFF filed a brief this week in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit arguing that app stores should not be liable for user speech just because they recommend that speech or process payments for those users. Those stores should be protected by Section 230, a law that protects Americans’ freedom of…

DC Circuit FOSTA Ruling Lets a Bad Law Stay on the Books, But Offers Meaningful Protection for Some Sex Work Forums and Sex Workers Using Online Services

Favorite The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit on July 7 affirmed the dismissal of Woodhull Freedom Foundation v. US, the constitutional challenge to FOSTA. That’s certainly disappointing: this bad law will now stay on the books. But the good news is that FOSTA stays on the books in a more limited manner: the…

Victory! Ninth Circuit Allows Human Rights Case to Move Forward Against Cisco Systems

Favorite People around the world have been searching for ways to hold accountable companies that build tools for government repression. From massive surveillance systems to state-sponsored malware, governments around the world are increasingly using technology to locate, track, and engage in human rights abuses against disfavored communities, journalists, and activists. In a tremendous victory for…

The United States vs. Hansen Decision Is Not “Encouraging” for Speech Rights

Favorite The U.S. Supreme Court’s recent ruling in United States v. Hansen upholds a law that makes it a crime to “encourage” a person to remain in the country without authorization. The Court had two choices in this case: instruct Congress and all legislatures to use the words they actually mean (and normal people use)…

Supreme Court Sends Bad Spaniels Back to Obedience School, Leaves Rogers Test Mostly Intact

Supreme Court Sends Bad Spaniels Back to Obedience School, Leaves Rogers Test Mostly Intact

Favorite The question of when you can use a trademark is one we see all the time—and one that is often misunderstood. Many of the world’s largest and most powerful companies are  fanatical about their trademarks. But that means the public is often in the dark about how their First Amendment rights stack up to…

Federal Judge Makes History in Holding That Border Searches of Cell Phones Require a Warrant

Favorite With United States v. Smith (S.D.N.Y. May 11, 2023), a district court judge in New York made history by being the first court to rule that a warrant is required for a cell phone search at the border, “absent exigent circumstances” (although other district courts have wanted to do so). EFF is thrilled about…

States Should Not Skirt Federal Rules on Fiber Infrastructure

Favorite Across the country, states are designing broadband plans to begin spending billions of federal dollars made available by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) and past COVID-19 rescue dollar investment programs. The Biden administration has consistently made clear that states are to build future-proof infrastructure to deliver broadband that will be useful for…